Wisteria Gardens in Pearl, MS has an overall 5-star rating, with strong staffing (5 stars) above the federal benchmark at 5.29 hours per resident per day and no fines in the last 24 months. Its health inspection rating is 4 stars, while quality measures are lower at 3 stars, and recent citations included food handling, medication errors, and accident hazard/supervision issues.
Last inspection: March 11, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.2856.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.88
Licensed practical nurses
1.06
Nurse aides
3.34
Weekend nursing
4.43
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 62%
Registered nurse turnover: 17%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Residents with a fall causing major injury
—0%—
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—0%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—16.7%—
Residents who lost too much weight
—8.3%—
Residents who were physically restrained
—0%—
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—12.5%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—8%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
2.5%3.1%Worsening
Residents with a long-term catheter
—6.9%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—45.4%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
—0%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—96%—
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—99.6%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%99.6%No change
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited February 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited February 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited March 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited March 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited February 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Occupancy
44.7 residents on an average day (86% of 52 beds)
Resident voice
Resident & family councils
Medicare history
Certified for 18 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.