Westfield Quality Care of Aurora has a 1 out of 5 overall rating, with 1 out of 5 in health inspections and staffing and 3 out of 5 for quality measures. It has the lowest overall rating flag, no fines in the last 24 months, and recent inspection citations included care orders, staffing for food and nutrition services, and food quality/temperature.
Last inspection: March 4, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0lowest overall rating
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
31.2%32.4%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
6.2%4.1%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
0%4.2%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
6.2%10.4%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
2.3%2.4%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
11.9%7.3%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
13.3%7%Improving
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
36.4%23.3%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
15.8%18.7%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
4.7%2.3%Improving
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—98%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
97.9%100%Improving
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—87%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—89.8%—
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited April 2024 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: J
The home failed to have enough qualified staff to properly provide food and nutrition services. Cited April 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 801 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: F
The home failed to make food and drinks appealing and served them at a safe, appetizing temperature. Cited April 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 804 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: F
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited April 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited April 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
Recent history
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 11 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $41,980 in total fines.
Federal fine
Apr 15, 2024
$41,980
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Occupancy
53.2 residents on an average day (83% of 64 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 21 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.