Waterford (Juno Beach, FL) has an overall 4 out of 5 stars, with 4-star health inspection, staffing, and quality ratings. It reported 3.49 nurse staffing hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark, with $0 in fines over the last 24 months.
Last inspection: February 6, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 3.4862.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
1.02
Licensed practical nurses
0.39
Nurse aides
2.08
Weekend nursing
3.30
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 23%
Registered nurse turnover: 44%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—14%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
10%19%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—0%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—5%—
Residents who lost too much weight
—3.6%—
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—13.6%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—4.4%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—1.7%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0.9%0%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
—0%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—5.7%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
—0%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—98.7%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
97.6%100%Improving
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited July 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited February 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited February 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to make sure a resident could get needed vision and hearing services. Cited February 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 685 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: D
The home failed to support and respect residents’ choices and self-determination. Cited October 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 561 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES · 16 homes · 4.2 stars avg
Occupancy
45.2 residents on an average day (75% of 60 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 44 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.