The home failed to provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy. Cited May 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 692 — 42 CFR §483.25(g) — S/S: E
Nursing home report
VILLAGE ON THE ISLE
VENICE, FL · Medicare-certified · 48 beds
In good standing
For-profit
Data as of July 1, 2026
5 of 5 overall
Village on the Isle (Venice, FL) has an overall 5-star rating, with 5-star staffing and quality measures and 4-star health inspections. Reported nurse staffing is 5.74 hours per resident per day versus the 4.1-hour federal benchmark, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
5.7446 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: November 5, 2024Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.7446.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.86
- Licensed practical nurses
- 0.47
- Nurse aides
- 3.42
- Weekend nursing
- 5.27
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 10%
Registered nurse turnover: 4%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
15%20%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
6.2%3.1%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
2.5%0%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%0%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
7.4%0%Improving
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
34.6%7.7%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—27.4%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
37%29.6%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
2.8%0%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
6.7%2.2%Improving
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
43.8%38.2%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—97.6%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
96.9%100%Improving
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—90.1%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
98.9%100%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to assess bed rail safety, review the risks and benefits, get informed consent, or properly install and maintain the rail. Cited May 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 700 — 42 CFR §483.25(n) — S/S: D
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited January 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: D
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Occupancy
- 50.3 residents on an average day (105% of 48 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 41 years
The most recent standard health inspection was more than two years ago.
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.