The Lodge at Mills River has an overall 5-star rating, with 5 stars for health inspections and quality measures, but 3 stars for staffing. Reported nurse staffing is 4.40 hours per resident per day, above the 4.1 federal benchmark, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: June 3, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.4001.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.78
Licensed practical nurses
0.84
Nurse aides
2.79
Weekend nursing
3.68
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 54%
Registered nurse turnover: 58%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—7.5%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
—6.7%—
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—1.4%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—3.5%—
Residents who lost too much weight
—12.5%—
Residents who were physically restrained
—0%—
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—10.5%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—19.1%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—21.6%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
1.4%0.6%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
—0%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—22.1%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
—8.9%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—98.3%—
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—97.8%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
97.8%98.1%No change
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited December 2022 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: J
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited December 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure residents who could safely take their own medicines were allowed to self-administer them. Cited December 2022 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 554 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited December 2022 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: D
The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited December 2022 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Part of SANSTONE HEALTH & REHABILITATION · 18 homes · 4.1 stars avg
Occupancy
45.4 residents on an average day (91% of 50 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 39 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.