GoodStanding

Nursing home report

Stonewall Living Center

Aspermont, TX · Medicare-certified · 53 beds

Needs attention
Government-run
2 of 5 overall

Stonewall Living Center in Aspermont, TX has an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. Its staffing and quality measures are both 1 star, health inspections are 4 stars, and it had $8,281 in fines in the last 24 months with a recent federal penalty.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

Quality measures

Last inspection: February 12, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $8,281recent federal penalty

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.

Staffing detail

Total staff turnover: 48%
Registered nurse turnover: 67%

Resident outcomes

How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

5.7%Improving

Residents with a fall causing major injury

7.5%Improving

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

0.5%Steady

Residents with a urinary tract infection

4.2%Improving

Residents who lost too much weight

3.1%Improving

Residents who were physically restrained

0%Steady

Residents needing more help with daily activities

26.8%Improving

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

38.8%Steady
Show all measures

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

23.8%Worsening

Residents with a long-term catheter

2.3%Steady

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

19.6%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

0.6%Improving

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

100%Steady

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

78.6%Improving

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

33.3%Steady

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited June 2025 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: J

The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited October 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F

The home failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and could make their own choices and communicate freely. Cited February 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 550 — 42 CFR §483.10(a) — S/S: E

The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited June 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: E

The home failed to protect residents’ right to complain without fear and did not ensure grievances were handled promptly. Cited November 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 585 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E

Recent history

  1. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  2. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $8,281 was recorded.

  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Penalties & enforcement

On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $8,281 in total fines.

  • Federal fine

    Jun 19, 2025

    $8,281

Operator & ownership

Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Occupancy
47.3 residents on an average day (89% of 53 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 20 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.