4 out of 5 stars overall. STONERIDGE POPLAR RUN has 4-star ratings for health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with reported nurse staffing above the federal benchmark (6.69 vs 4.1 hours per resident per day), no fines in the last 24 months, and recent inspection citations in food handling and resident assessment.
Last inspection: November 14, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 6.6926.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
1.83
Licensed practical nurses
1.72
Nurse aides
3.15
Weekend nursing
6.28
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 54%
Registered nurse turnover: 46%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—31%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
0%0%No change
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.7%0%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%0%No change
Residents who lost too much weight
—5.5%—
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—27.9%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—21.4%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—20%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
—0%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
21.4%21.5%No change
Residents with depressive symptoms
3.8%4.5%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
96.2%86.4%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
63.6%80.8%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited October 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The home failed to properly assess a resident after a major change in condition. Cited November 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 637 — 42 CFR §483.20(b)(2) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited November 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to make sure its quality review group had the required members and met at least every three months. Cited November 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 868 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Occupancy
26.7 residents on an average day (44% of 60 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 32 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.