4 out of 5 stars overall. Stonehill Communities in Dubuque has 4-star ratings for health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, nurse staffing is slightly above the federal benchmark (4.31 vs. 4.1 hours per resident per day), and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: August 7, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.3082.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.93
Licensed practical nurses
0.34
Nurse aides
3.04
Weekend nursing
3.88
Hours per resident per day.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
26.7%22.9%Improving
Residents with a fall causing major injury
7.1%2.5%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
1.1%3.9%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%9.7%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
0%2.1%Worsening
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
21.2%23.5%Worsening
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
10%15.1%Worsening
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
15.2%13.1%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
3.3%1.7%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
0.7%0%Improving
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
21.2%20.6%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
3.4%1.7%Improving
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—99.2%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
99.2%100%Improving
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—93.6%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
90.1%89.9%No change
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited August 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited August 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited June 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited June 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
156.9 residents on an average day (85% of 185 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 23 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.