GoodStanding

Nursing home report

ST JOHNS PLACE

SAINT LOUIS, MO · Medicare-certified · 94 beds

Needs attention
For-profit
Data as of September 1, 2026
1 of 5 overall

ST JOHNS PLACE in Saint Louis has an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, with 1-star staffing and quality measures and a 3-star health inspection rating. It has no fines in the last 24 months, but it is flagged for the lowest overall rating.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

Quality measures

Last inspection: December 9, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0lowest overall rating

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

53.3%39.4%Improving

Residents with a fall causing major injury

4%8%Worsening

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

6.3%9%Worsening

Residents with a urinary tract infection

0%0%No change

Residents who lost too much weight

0%4.5%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

6.5%25.6%Worsening

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

8.4%32.2%Worsening

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

18%8.7%Improving

Residents with a long-term catheter

4%2.7%Improving

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

2%13%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

0%8.5%Worsening

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

—100%—

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

98%94%Worsening

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

—100%—

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%80%Worsening

What the inspectors found

The home failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information based on verifiable records. Cited December 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 851 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to provide the required notice or documentation about a resident’s needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policy. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 628 — 42 CFR §483.15(c)(2) — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: E

The home failed to provide activities that met all residents’ needs. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 679 — 42 CFR §483.24 — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to ensure nurse aides were properly trained and competent to provide safe care. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 728 — 42 CFR §483.35(e) — S/S: E

Recent history

  1. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Occupancy
56.9 residents on an average day (61% of 94 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 24 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.