The nursing home failed to provide proper pressure ulcer care and failed to prevent new pressure sores from developing. Cited October 2025 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 686 — 42 CFR §483.25(b) — S/S: G
Nursing home report
SPRING HILLS POST ACUTE HAMILTON
HAMILTON, NJ · Medicare-certified · 55 beds
Needs attention
For-profit
3 of 5 overall
Spring Hills Post Acute Hamilton has an overall 3 out of 5 stars, with weak health inspection and staffing ratings (2 out of 5 each) despite a 5 out of 5 quality measures score. It has a recent federal penalty and $11,175 in fines in the last 24 months; reported nurse staffing is 4.74 hours per resident day, above the federal benchmark of 4.1.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
4.7376 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: October 24, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $11,175recent federal penalty
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.7376.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 0.70
- Licensed practical nurses
- 1.62
- Nurse aides
- 2.42
- Weekend nursing
- 4.24
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 86%
Registered nurse turnover: 78%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0.8%0.6%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—28.6%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
25.4%8.3%Worsening
What the inspectors found
The home failed to ensure it was properly licensed and following all required laws, rules, and professional standards. Cited February 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 836 — 42 CFR §483.70(a) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to keep essential equipment working safely. Cited October 2020 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 908 — 42 CFR §483.90 — S/S: F
The home failed to provide safe, appropriate dialysis care for a resident who needed it. Cited February 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 698 — 42 CFR §483.25(l) — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist reviewed residents' medications each month and reported any problems as required. Cited February 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 756 — 42 CFR §483.45(c) — S/S: E
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- PENALTY
A federal fine of $11,175 was recorded.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $11,175 in total fines.
- $11,175
Federal fine
Oct 24, 2025
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Occupancy
- 44.7 residents on an average day (81% of 55 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 11 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.