The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited September 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G
Nursing home report
SPLENDIDO AT RANCHO VISTOSO
TUCSON, AZ · Medicare-certified · 42 beds
Needs attention
For-profitChain member
Data as of September 1, 2026
2 of 5 overall
Splendido at Rancho Vistoso in Tucson has an overall 2-star rating, with 2 stars for health inspections and 1 star for staffing, despite 5 stars for quality measures. It has a recent federal penalty with $8,018 in fines, and reported nurse staffing is above the federal benchmark (4.97 vs. 4.1 hours per resident per day).
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
4.97 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: July 24, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $8,018recent federal penalty
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.97.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 0.55
- Licensed practical nurses
- 1.37
- Nurse aides
- 3.05
- Weekend nursing
- 4.34
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 18%
Registered nurse turnover: 38%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
15%9.1%Improving
Residents with a fall causing major injury
6.5%3.1%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
4.5%7.6%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%0%No change
Residents who lost too much weight
0%0%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
37.5%16%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—13.6%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
25.9%29.6%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%0%No change
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
19.1%6.3%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
3.2%0%Improving
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%96.9%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—98.4%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%96.2%Worsening
What the inspectors found
The home failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and could make their own choices and communicate freely. Cited July 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 550 — 42 CFR §483.10(a) — S/S: E
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited July 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: E
The home failed to have a registered nurse on duty enough hours each day and to keep a registered nurse as the full-time director of nursing. Cited July 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 727 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: E
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited July 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: E
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 9 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- PENALTY
A federal fine of $8,018 was recorded.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $8,018 in total fines.
- $8,018
Federal fine
Sep 10, 2024
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of MATHER SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES · 2 homes · 3.5 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 35.4 residents on an average day (84% of 42 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 18 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.