GoodStanding

Nursing home report

SHERMAN OAKS HOSPITAL SNF DP

SHERMAN OAKS, CA · Medicare-certified · 22 beds

In good standing
For-profitChain member
4 of 5 overall

Overall rating: 4 of 5 stars. This facility scores well on quality measures (5 of 5) and staffing (4 of 5), with nurse staffing at 8.74 hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark; health inspections are lower at 3 of 5 stars, and there were $0 in fines in the last 24 months.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

8.7358 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: April 13, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 8.7358.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
2.63
Licensed practical nurses
2.41
Nurse aides
3.70
Weekend nursing
7.85

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 5%
Registered nurse turnover: 8%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

6.5%

Residents with a fall causing major injury

0%0%No change

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

15.7%11.6%Improving

Residents with a urinary tract infection

5%0%Improving

Residents who lost too much weight

10%5%Improving

Residents who were physically restrained

0%5%Worsening

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

5%5%No change

Residents with a long-term catheter

3.3%

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

0%

Residents with depressive symptoms

0%

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%100%No change

What the inspectors found

The home failed to have a responsible governing body to set and carry out policies and properly manage the facility. Cited April 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 837 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F

The home failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints unless they were needed for medical treatment. Cited April 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 604 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: F

The home failed to assess bed rail safety, review the risks and benefits, get informed consent, or properly install and maintain the rail. Cited April 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 700 — 42 CFR §483.25(n) — S/S: F

The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: E

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 13 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 11 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 9 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of PRIME HEALTHCARE · 6 homes · 3.3 stars avg
Occupancy
20 residents on an average day (91% of 22 beds)
Medicare history
Certified for 12 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.