Sharkey-Isaquena Nursing Home in Rolling Fork, MS has a 3 out of 5 overall rating, with 3 out of 5 for health inspections and 4 out of 5 for quality measures. It has no fines in the last 24 months; staffing is not rated.
Last inspection: October 3, 2024Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
18.2%22.7%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
0%0%No change
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
4.2%2.2%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%2.5%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
0%0%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
19%8.8%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—10.7%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
12.5%16.2%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
—8.7%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%1.7%Worsening
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
23.8%17.8%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%6.1%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%82.5%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—23.9%—
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited October 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited October 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The home failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and could make their own choices and communicate freely. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 550 — 42 CFR §483.10(a) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to properly screen residents for mental health or intellectual disability needs before or during admission. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 645 — 42 CFR §483.20 — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide proper pressure ulcer care and failed to prevent new pressure sores from developing. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 686 — 42 CFR §483.25(b) — S/S: D
Recent history
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Government - County
Occupancy
45.1 residents on an average day (84% of 54 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 30 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.