Sharkey-Isaquena Nursing Home in Rolling Fork, MS has a 2 out of 5 overall rating, with a 2-star health inspection rating and 3-star quality measures rating; staffing is not rated and there were no fines in the last 24 months. Recent inspection issues included pharmacist medication review, staffing data submission, and food handling/procurement requirements.
Last inspection: June 11, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
18.2%28.6%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
3.3%2.1%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.6%7.1%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%4.3%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
3.6%4.3%Worsening
Residents who were physically restrained
6.7%0%Improving
Residents needing more help with daily activities
8.3%12.5%Worsening
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—7.9%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
14.3%15.2%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
—9.1%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%1.9%Worsening
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
21.4%24.2%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
73.3%66%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—23.1%—
What the inspectors found
The home failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist reviewed residents' medications each month and reported any problems as required. Cited June 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 756 — 42 CFR §483.45(c) — S/S: F
The home failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information based on verifiable records. Cited June 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 851 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited October 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited October 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The home failed to honor residents’ choices about treatment, research participation, and advance care instructions. Cited June 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 578 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
Recent history
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 12 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Government - County
Occupancy
49.2 residents on an average day (91% of 54 beds)
Resident voice
Resident & family councils
Medicare history
Certified for 30 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.