The home failed to ensure it was properly licensed and following all required laws, rules, and professional standards. Cited May 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 836 — 42 CFR §483.70(a) — S/S: F
Nursing home report
SHADELANDS POST ACUTE
WALNUT CREEK, CA · Medicare-certified · 59 beds
In good standing
For-profitChain member
Data as of July 1, 2026
4 of 5 overall
Shadelands Post Acute has an overall 4-star rating, with strong quality measures but weaker staffing at 2 stars and a 3-star health inspection rating. It reported 4.31 nurse hours per resident day, slightly above the 4.1 federal benchmark, and had no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
4.3135 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: May 14, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.3135.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 0.55
- Licensed practical nurses
- 1.47
- Nurse aides
- 2.30
- Weekend nursing
- 3.78
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 45%
Registered nurse turnover: 33%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
1.4%3.5%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The home failed to monitor antibiotic use properly. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 881 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to develop and follow policies to make sure residents received flu and pneumonia vaccinations. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 883 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: E
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 12 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of PACS GROUP · 281 homes · 2.8 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 58.5 residents on an average day (99% of 59 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 4 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.