GoodStanding

Nursing home report

SERENITY HILL NURSING CENTER

WRENTHAM, MA · Medicare-certified · 44 beds

Needs attention
For-profit
1 of 5 overall

SERENITY HILL NURSING CENTER has a 1 out of 5 overall star rating, with 1-star health inspection and staffing ratings and 2-star quality measures; it is flagged for the lowest overall rating, had no fines in the last 24 months, and its staffing is below the federal benchmark.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

Quality measures

Last inspection: April 29, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0lowest overall rating

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.

Resident outcomes

How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

37.7%Worsening

Residents with a fall causing major injury

0%Steady

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

1.4%Improving

Residents with a urinary tract infection

2.3%Steady

Residents who lost too much weight

8.3%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

0%Steady

Residents needing more help with daily activities

24.8%Worsening

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

17%Steady
Show all measures

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

19.3%Steady

Residents with a long-term catheter

4.9%Steady

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

19.5%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

1%Worsening

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

97.4%Steady

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

90.4%Worsening

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

35.7%Steady

What the inspectors found

The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited April 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to regularly check beds, mattresses, and bed rails to make sure they were safely attached and safe to use. Cited April 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 909 — 42 CFR §483.90 — S/S: F

The home failed to have a registered nurse on duty enough hours each day and to keep a registered nurse as the full-time director of nursing. Cited May 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 727 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F

The home failed to have an ongoing quality review group that finds problems and makes corrective plans. Cited March 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 867 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to report COVID-19 data to residents and families. Cited March 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 885 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: F

Recent history

  1. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 17 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 8 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Occupancy
33.8 residents on an average day (77% of 44 beds)
Resident voice
Resident & family councils
Medicare history
Certified for 26 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.