The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited April 2026 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: G
Nursing home report
Registered name: SANDSTONE OF TUCSON REHAB CENTRE
TUCSON, AZ · Medicare-certified · 240 beds
Sandstone of Tucson has a 2-star overall rating, with a 1-star health inspection rating despite 4-star staffing and 5-star quality measures. It also has a recent abuse citation, $55,090 in fines over the last 24 months, and reported nurse staffing of 3.76 hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark.
Health inspections
Staffing
3.7592 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 3.7592.
Hours per resident per day.
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
Residents with a fall causing major injury
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
Residents with a urinary tract infection
Residents who lost too much weight
Residents who were physically restrained
Residents needing more help with daily activities
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
Residents with a long-term catheter
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
Residents with depressive symptoms
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited April 2026 — isolated incident, actual harm.
F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: G
The home failed to ensure residents’ medications were free from unnecessary drugs. Cited December 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
F-Tag 757 — 42 CFR §483.45(d) — S/S: E
The home failed to protect residents’ right to organize and take part in resident and family groups. Cited November 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
F-Tag 565 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
The home failed to create and carry out a timely plan to meet a new resident’s most immediate needs after admission. Cited September 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
F-Tag 655 — 42 CFR §483.21 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to coordinate resident assessments with required screening and make needed service referrals. Cited September 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
F-Tag 644 — 42 CFR §483.20 — S/S: E
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
A federal fine of $34,160 was recorded.
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
A federal fine of $20,930 was recorded.
On record with Medicare: 2 fines · $55,090 in total fines.
Federal fine
Apr 3, 2026
Federal fine
Apr 22, 2025
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.