Sandhills Care Center in Ainsworth, NE has an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Its health inspection rating is 2 stars, staffing is 3 stars with reported nurse staffing slightly above the federal benchmark (4.27 vs. 4.1 hours/resident/day), quality measures are 5 stars, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: June 17, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.2733.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.78
Licensed practical nurses
0.44
Nurse aides
3.05
Weekend nursing
3.36
Hours per resident per day.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—7.4%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
0%0%No change
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
0%0%No change
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%0%No change
Residents who lost too much weight
8.3%0%Improving
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
45%44%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—19.1%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
0%0%No change
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
25.3%29.4%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
24.1%28.6%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—96.9%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—87.1%—
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited June 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited May 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited May 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: F
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited June 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited May 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: E
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 11 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Government - City/county
Occupancy
31.7 residents on an average day (69% of 46 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 9 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.