The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited April 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: D
Nursing home report
SAGE CREEK POST-ACUTE
LAS VEGAS, NV · Medicare-certified · 60 beds
In good standing
For-profitChain member
Data as of July 1, 2026
5 of 5 overall
SAGE CREEK POST-ACUTE in Las Vegas has an overall 5-star rating, with strong quality measures and a 4-star health inspection score, but a low 2-star staffing rating. Reported nurse staffing is 4.39 hours per resident per day, above the federal benchmark of 4.1, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
4.3894 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: April 30, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.3894.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.23
- Licensed practical nurses
- 1.17
- Nurse aides
- 1.99
- Weekend nursing
- 4.02
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 52%
Registered nurse turnover: 52%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
1.1%0.3%Improving
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—69.5%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
75.7%87.9%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to provide safe, appropriate dialysis care for a resident who needed it. Cited April 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 698 — 42 CFR §483.25(l) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited April 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: D
The home failed to honor residents’ choices about treatment, research participation, and advance care instructions. Cited May 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 578 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
The home failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment and daily care supports were provided safely. Cited May 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 584 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of PACS GROUP · 281 homes · 2.8 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 57.6 residents on an average day (96% of 60 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 8 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.