GoodStanding

Nursing home report

RUSSELL REGIONAL HOSPITAL LTCU

RUSSELL, KS · Medicare-certified · 23 beds

Needs attention
Non-profit
1 of 5 overall

1 out of 5 stars overall. Russell Regional Hospital LTCU has the lowest overall rating, with 1 star for staffing and quality, 2 stars for health inspections, no fines in the last 24 months, and recent citations for staffing data reporting, quality assurance, and infection control.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

Quality measures

Last inspection: September 16, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0lowest overall rating

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

36.7%

Residents with a fall causing major injury

6.9%

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

1.4%

Residents with a urinary tract infection

8.5%

Residents who lost too much weight

5.7%

Residents who were physically restrained

0%

Residents needing more help with daily activities

17.9%

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

22.2%

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

29.6%

Residents with a long-term catheter

13.8%

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

22.7%

Residents with depressive symptoms

6.1%

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

93.1%

What the inspectors found

The home failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information based on verifiable records. Cited September 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 851 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to make sure its quality review group had the required members and met at least every three months. Cited September 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 868 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited September 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to ensure a qualified person was assigned to oversee infection prevention and control. Cited September 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 882 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to encode each resident’s assessment data and send it to the state on time. Cited January 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 640 — 42 CFR §483.20 — S/S: F

Recent history

  1. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 12 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 13 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 8 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
18.5 residents on an average day (80% of 23 beds)
Resident voice
Resident & family councils
Medicare history
Certified for 23 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.