The nursing home failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Cited February 2026 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 760 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(2) — S/S: J
Nursing home report
Registered name: RUNNELLS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE
BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NJ · Medicare-certified · 300 beds
Runnells Care Center in Berkeley Heights, NJ has a 1-star overall rating, with a 1-star health inspection rating despite 4-star staffing and quality measures. It had $14,901 in fines in the last 24 months and a recent federal penalty; reported nurse staffing was 4.24 hours per resident per day, slightly above the federal benchmark of 4.1.
Health inspections
Staffing
4.2408 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.2408.
Hours per resident per day.
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
Residents with a fall causing major injury
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
Residents with a urinary tract infection
Residents who lost too much weight
Residents who were physically restrained
Residents needing more help with daily activities
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
Residents with a long-term catheter
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
Residents with depressive symptoms
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
The nursing home failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Cited February 2026 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 760 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(2) — S/S: J
The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited July 2023 — isolated incident, actual harm.
F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: G
The nursing home failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality. Cited October 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
F-Tag 658 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(3) — S/S: E
The home failed to provide appropriate care to help a resident maintain or improve movement and mobility. Cited January 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
F-Tag 688 — 42 CFR §483.25(c) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited January 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
A federal fine of $14,901 was recorded.
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
A federal fine of $22,925 was recorded.
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $14,901 in total fines.
Federal fine
Feb 4, 2026
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.