The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited May 2025 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G
Nursing home report
RITTENHOUSE POST ACUTE
PHILADELPHIA, PA · Medicare-certified · 38 beds
In good standing
For-profitChain member
4 of 5 overall
Rittenhouse Post Acute in Philadelphia has an overall 4-star rating, with strong quality measures at 5 stars and staffing at 4 stars. It reports 5.51 nurse staffing hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark, has no fines in the last 24 months, and its health inspection rating is 3 stars with recent citations in accident safety, activities, and food handling.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
5.5061 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: August 19, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.5061.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.28
- Licensed practical nurses
- 2.28
- Nurse aides
- 1.94
- Weekend nursing
- 4.84
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 60%
Registered nurse turnover: 40%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—31.8%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
27.7%88.7%Improving
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to make sure its activities program was led by a qualified professional. Cited August 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 680 — 42 CFR §483.24 — S/S: E
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited August 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited August 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited August 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 8 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES · 88 homes · 3 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 17.9 residents on an average day (47% of 38 beds)
- Medicare history
- Certified for 38 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.