The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited April 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
Nursing home report
RETREAT AT THE STRATFORD, THE
CARMEL, IN · Medicare-certified · 18 beds
In good standing
For-profitChain member
4 of 5 overall
Retreat at the Stratford in Carmel, IN has an overall 4 out of 5 stars, with 4-star health inspection and staffing ratings and 3-star quality measures. It reports 6.38 nurse staffing hours per resident day, above the federal benchmark of 4.1, with no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
6.3804 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: February 12, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 6.3804.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.80
- Licensed practical nurses
- 1.08
- Nurse aides
- 3.49
- Weekend nursing
- 5.79
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 81%
Registered nurse turnover: 83%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Residents with a fall causing major injury
—4.5%—
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—1.8%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—0%—
Residents who were physically restrained
—0%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%0%No change
Residents with depressive symptoms
—5%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—77.3%—
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—82.4%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
72%26.8%Worsening
What the inspectors found
The home failed to promptly tell the resident, doctor, and family about changes or problems affecting the resident. Cited February 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 580 — 42 CFR §483.10(g)(14) — S/S: D
The home failed to ensure residents who could safely take their own medicines were allowed to self-administer them. Cited June 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 554 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited June 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: D
The home failed to honor residents’ choices about treatment, research participation, and advance care instructions. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 578 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- PENALTY
A federal payment denial was recorded.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 payment denial.
- 6 days
Medicare/Medicaid payment denial
Mar 27, 2025
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Part of SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES · 9 homes · 4.6 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 11.5 residents on an average day (64% of 18 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 14 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.