RESIDENCES AT VANTAGE POINT (Columbia, MD) has a 5 out of 5 overall star rating, with 5-star staffing and quality measures and a 4-star health inspection rating. It reported 5.23 nurse staffing hours per resident per day versus the 4.1-hour federal benchmark, and had $0 in fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: December 13, 2024Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.2328.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
1.76
Licensed practical nurses
0.78
Nurse aides
2.69
Weekend nursing
4.82
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 23%
Registered nurse turnover: 57%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—60%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
—6%—
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—4.7%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—0%—
Residents who lost too much weight
—7.1%—
Residents who were physically restrained
—0%—
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—8.8%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—16.7%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
3.6%0%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
—0%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—8.3%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
—6.4%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—88%—
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—94.6%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
68.4%100%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited December 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The home failed to keep residents’ personal and medical records private and confidential. Cited December 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 583 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited December 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited December 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: D
The home failed to respond appropriately to all reported abuse or neglect concerns. Cited December 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 610 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 11 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of LIFE CARE SERVICES · 45 homes · 4.1 stars avg
Occupancy
16.7 residents on an average day (38% of 44 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 22 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.