The home failed to honor residents’ choices about treatment, research participation, and advance care instructions. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 578 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
Nursing home report
Promontory Point Rehabilitation
Ammon, ID · Medicare-certified · 50 beds
In good standing
For-profitChain member
Data as of July 1, 2026
5 of 5 overall
Promontory Point Rehabilitation in Ammon, ID has an overall 5-star rating, with 5 stars for staffing and quality and 4 stars for health inspections. It reports 5.62 nurse staffing hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark, with $0 in fines over the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
5.6232 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: May 28, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.6232.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.43
- Licensed practical nurses
- 0.91
- Nurse aides
- 3.29
- Weekend nursing
- 4.95
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 21%
Registered nurse turnover: 25%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0.6%1.6%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—95.5%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
95.4%94.4%Worsening
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The home failed to create and carry out a timely plan to meet a new resident’s most immediate needs after admission. Cited March 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 655 — 42 CFR §483.21 — S/S: E
The home failed to make sure residents fully understood their health status, care, and treatments. Cited May 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 552 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
The home failed to ensure residents who could safely take their own medicines were allowed to self-administer them. Cited May 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 554 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 8 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 17 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of PROMONTORY HEALTHCARE · 3 homes · 3.3 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 37.5 residents on an average day (75% of 50 beds)
- Medicare history
- Certified for 15 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.