GoodStanding

Nursing home report

PLYMOUTH HARBOR INCORPORATED

SARASOTA, FL · Medicare-certified · 56 beds

In good standing
Non-profit
5 of 5 overall

PLYMOUTH HARBOR INCORPORATED (SARASOTA, FL) has a 5-star overall rating, with 4 stars for health inspections and staffing and 5 stars for quality measures. It reports 4.99 nurse staffing hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark, with $0 in fines in the last 24 months.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

4.9937 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: December 11, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.9937.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.97
Licensed practical nurses
1.12
Nurse aides
2.90
Weekend nursing
4.58

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 48%
Registered nurse turnover: 64%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

12%

Residents with a fall causing major injury

1.6%

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

0%

Residents with a urinary tract infection

0%

Residents who lost too much weight

3.2%

Residents who were physically restrained

0%

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

23.5%

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

1.2%1%No change

Residents with a long-term catheter

0%

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

10.9%

Residents with depressive symptoms

1.8%

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

99.2%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%99.3%Worsening

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited March 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited March 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited December 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: D

The home failed to honor residents’ choices about treatment, research participation, and advance care instructions. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 578 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D

The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: D

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
34.1 residents on an average day (61% of 56 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 33 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.