GoodStanding

Nursing home report

PINERS NURSING HOME

NAPA, CA · Medicare-certified · 49 beds

Needs attention
For-profit
1 of 5 overall

PINERS NURSING HOME in Napa, CA has an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, the lowest overall rating. Health inspections and quality measures are both 2 stars, staffing is 1 star, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

Quality measures

Last inspection: March 26, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0lowest overall rating

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

17.7%

Residents with a fall causing major injury

4%6.2%Worsening

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

0%1.6%Worsening

Residents with a urinary tract infection

0%15.6%Worsening

Residents who lost too much weight

0%8%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

36.4%16.7%Improving

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

29%

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

4.8%4%Improving

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0%4.2%Worsening

Residents with a long-term catheter

6.1%2.3%Improving

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

40.4%24.9%Improving

Residents with depressive symptoms

10%11.1%Worsening

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

100%

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%93.8%Worsening

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

85%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

70%56%Worsening

What the inspectors found

The home failed to ensure residents’ medications were free from unnecessary drugs. Cited March 2026 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 757 — 42 CFR §483.45(d) — S/S: G

The home failed to ensure nurses and nurse aides had the needed skills to care for each resident and support their well-being. Cited August 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 726 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F

The home failed to have a registered nurse on duty enough hours each day and to keep a registered nurse as the full-time director of nursing. Cited August 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 727 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F

The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited August 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: F

The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited August 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: F

Recent history

  1. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 14 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Individual
Occupancy
35.6 residents on an average day (73% of 49 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 40 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.