The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited May 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
Nursing home report
PINE VILLAGE
MOUNDRIDGE, KS · Medicare-certified · 74 beds
In good standing
Non-profit
Data as of July 1, 2026
2 of 5 overall
Pine Village in Moundridge, KS has an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. It has a 4-star health inspection rating but very low staffing and quality ratings at 1 star each, with no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
Quality measures
Last inspection: May 6, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Staffing detail
Total staff turnover: 55%
Registered nurse turnover: 38%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
8%14.6%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
6.2%11.3%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.9%0%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3%1.6%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
0%3.7%Worsening
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
38.2%28.3%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
19.5%23.8%Worsening
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
10.5%12.7%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
—0%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%1.3%Worsening
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
22%37.3%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
1.6%6.6%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
96.9%93.5%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—79.3%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
76%84.8%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information based on verifiable records. Cited May 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 851 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F
The home failed to properly watch nurse aides' work and provide regular training. Cited August 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 730 — 42 CFR §483.35(e)(7) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited May 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure residents’ medications were free from unnecessary drugs. Cited May 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 757 — 42 CFR §483.45(d) — S/S: D
Recent history
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Occupancy
- 65.9 residents on an average day (89% of 74 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident & family councils
- Medicare history
- Certified for 29 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.