PARK MANOR LTD in Park Falls, WI has an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Its staffing rating is low at 1 out of 5 stars, while health inspections are 4 out of 5 stars and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: May 6, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
7.5%6.9%Improving
Residents with a fall causing major injury
3.1%7.7%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
0%0%No change
Residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%5.2%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
3.3%8.9%Worsening
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
28.8%10.5%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
22.2%8.8%Improving
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
15.6%12.7%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
4.2%0%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%1.4%Worsening
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
29.3%35%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—96.1%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
73.7%69.8%Worsening
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide the required notice or documentation about a resident’s needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policy. Cited September 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 628 — 42 CFR §483.15(c)(2) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited July 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited July 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The home failed to promptly report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and share the investigation results with the proper authorities. Cited May 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 609 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: D
The home failed to respond appropriately to all reported abuse or neglect concerns. Cited May 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 610 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: D
Recent history
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Occupancy
73.2 residents on an average day (80% of 92 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 29 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.