The nursing home failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 658 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(3) — S/S: D
Nursing home report
Osceola Senior Living
Sibley, IA · Medicare-certified · 46 beds
In good standing
For-profit
Not yet rated
Osceola Senior Living in Sibley, IA is not rated overall, with no reported fines in the last 24 months and nurse staffing slightly below the federal benchmark (4.04 vs. 4.1 hours per resident per day). Recent inspection citations included professional standards of quality, respiratory care, and dementia care.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
4.0396 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: March 13, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.0396.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.01
- Licensed practical nurses
- 0.37
- Nurse aides
- 2.66
- Weekend nursing
- 3.60
Hours per resident per day.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
15%15%No change
Residents with a fall causing major injury
2.9%6.7%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
9.8%3.3%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%0%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
3.8%0%Improving
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
15.4%20%Worsening
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—7.5%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
11.5%16%Worsening
Residents with a long-term catheter
7.9%6.5%Improving
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
31.9%16.5%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
3.3%10.7%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—97.1%—
What the inspectors found
The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: D
The home failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services for a resident with dementia. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 744 — 42 CFR §483.40(b)(3) — S/S: D
The home failed to properly reduce or limit psychotropic medication use and try safer non-drug approaches when appropriate. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 758 — 42 CFR §483.45(e) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: D
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Occupancy
- 31.7 residents on an average day (69% of 46 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 1 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.