The home failed to have enough qualified staff to properly provide food and nutrition services. Cited April 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 801 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: F
Nursing home report
Old Mill Rehabilitation
Omaha, NE · Medicare-certified · 44 beds
In good standing
For-profitChain member
Data as of July 1, 2026
3 of 5 overall
Old Mill Rehabilitation has a 3 out of 5 star overall rating, with 3-star health inspection, staffing, and quality ratings. Reported nurse staffing is 4.85 hours per resident day, above the federal benchmark of 4.1, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
4.8518 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: April 2, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.8518.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 0.61
- Licensed practical nurses
- 1.35
- Nurse aides
- 2.89
- Weekend nursing
- 4.28
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 67%
Registered nurse turnover: 78%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0.5%1%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—87.5%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
97.1%97%No change
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited April 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The home failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment and daily care supports were provided safely. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 584 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure there was enough outside ventilation in the area, through windows, mechanical systems, or both. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 923 — 42 CFR §483.90 — S/S: E
The home failed to provide enough nursing staff each day and ensure a licensed nurse was in charge on every shift. Cited November 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 725 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: E
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Part of PROMONTORY HEALTHCARE · 3 homes · 3.3 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 37.2 residents on an average day (85% of 44 beds)
- Medicare history
- Certified for 12 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.