NEW BRIGHTON CARE CENTER has an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, with a lowest-overall-rating flag. Its staffing rating is 1 star, health inspection is 2 stars, quality measures are 3 stars, and it had $0 in fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: November 20, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0lowest overall rating
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
14.3%22.7%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
3.2%3.1%No change
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
14.1%4.8%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%3.1%No change
Residents who lost too much weight
6.9%3.3%Improving
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
42.9%25%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—32.1%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
10.3%16.7%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%0%No change
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
23.7%28.9%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
4.5%0%Improving
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%96.9%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—61.3%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
94.5%90.7%Worsening
What the inspectors found
The home failed to conduct and document a full facility assessment to ensure it had the resources needed for daily care and emergencies. Cited November 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 838 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F
The home failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information based on verifiable records. Cited November 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 851 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to post its nurse staffing information every day, so families could not easily see daily staffing levels. Cited October 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 732 — 42 CFR §483.35(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to ensure a qualified person was assigned to oversee infection prevention and control. Cited October 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 882 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: F
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited November 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
Recent history
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Occupancy
42.2 residents on an average day (74% of 57 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 39 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.