The home failed to properly watch nurse aides' work and provide regular training. Cited March 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 730 — 42 CFR §483.35(e)(7) — S/S: F
Nursing home report
MOUNT ST MARY
WICHITA, KS · Medicare-certified · 24 beds
In good standing
Non-profitChain member
5 of 5 overall
Mount St Mary in Wichita, KS has an overall 5-star rating, with 5 stars for staffing and 4 stars for health inspections; quality measures are 3 stars. It reports 5.44 nurse staffing hours per resident per day, above the federal benchmark of 4.1, and had $0 in fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
5.4366 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: March 31, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.4366.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.02
- Licensed practical nurses
- 0.74
- Nurse aides
- 3.67
- Weekend nursing
- 4.88
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 36%
Registered nurse turnover: 20%
Resident outcomes
How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
29.8%Steady
Residents with a fall causing major injury
2.5%Steady
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
9.4%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
4.8%Steady
Residents who were physically restrained
0%Steady
Residents needing more help with daily activities
28.1%Steady
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
26.9%Steady
Show all measures
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
8.1%Steady
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%Steady
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
32.6%Steady
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%Steady
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
100%Steady
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%Steady
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
70%Steady
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited October 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited October 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: E
The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: D
The home failed to provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 697 — 42 CFR §483.25(k) — S/S: D
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 8 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Part of CSJ INITIATIVES · 2 homes · 4.5 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 20.1 residents on an average day (84% of 24 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 8 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.