GoodStanding

Nursing home report

Mesa Glen Care Center

GLENDORA, CA · Medicare-certified · 96 beds

Needs attention
Special Focus candidateAbuse citationFor-profit
Data as of July 1, 2026
1 of 5 overall

Mesa Glen Care Center in Glendora has a 1-star overall rating, with 1-star health inspections and low staffing/quality ratings (2 stars each). It is a special-focus candidate/facility, with $103,080 in fines over the last 24 months, and reported nurse staffing of 4.11 hours per resident per day, just above the federal benchmark of 4.1.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

4.1134 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: May 28, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $103,080special focus facility

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.1134.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.30
Licensed practical nurses
1.13
Nurse aides
2.69
Weekend nursing
3.78

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 63%
Registered nurse turnover: 83%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

31.2%35.7%Worsening

Residents with a fall causing major injury

1.2%2.4%Worsening

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

7%10.4%Worsening

Residents with a urinary tract infection

1.3%0%Improving

Residents who lost too much weight

0%1.2%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

8.5%5.1%Improving

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

10.8%11.8%Worsening

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

23.1%23.2%No change

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

11.7%

Residents with a long-term catheter

0%1%Worsening

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

1.2%4.8%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

22.4%13.6%Improving

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

100%

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%100%No change

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

96.2%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

97.5%100%Improving

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited August 2024 — limited pattern, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: H

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G

The nursing home failed to reasonably accommodate each resident’s needs and preferences. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 558 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited May 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: E

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 26 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  4. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  5. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  6. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  7. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  8. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  9. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  10. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  11. PENALTY

    A federal payment denial was recorded.

  12. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $66,576 was recorded.

  13. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $36,504 was recorded.

Penalties & enforcement

On record with Medicare: 2 fines · $103,080 in total fines · 1 payment denial.

  • Medicare/Medicaid payment denial

    Mar 7, 2025

    33 days
  • Federal fine

    Mar 7, 2025

    $66,576
  • Federal fine

    Jul 18, 2024

    $36,504

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Occupancy
88.1 residents on an average day (92% of 96 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 17 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.