GoodStanding

Nursing home report

MERIT HEALTH WESLEY

HATTIESBURG, MS · Medicare-certified · 25 beds

In good standing
For-profit
Data as of July 1, 2026
5 of 5 overall

MERIT HEALTH WESLEY has a 5 out of 5 star overall rating, with 5-star health inspection and staffing ratings, 3-star quality measures, and no fines in the last 24 months. Reported nurse staffing is 5.83 hours per resident per day, above the federal benchmark of 4.1, though recent inspection citations included food safety, infection prevention and control, and respiratory care.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

5.8276 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: February 19, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.8276.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
2.60
Licensed practical nurses
1.73
Nurse aides
1.50
Weekend nursing
4.89

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 33%
Registered nurse turnover: 20%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

3.5%0.8%Improving

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

72.8%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

78%85.1%Improving

What the inspectors found

The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited September 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited March 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F

The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited March 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: E

The home failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and could make their own choices and communicate freely. Cited February 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 550 — 42 CFR §483.10(a) — S/S: D

The nursing home failed to ensure a qualified person was assigned to oversee infection prevention and control. Cited September 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 882 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: D

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Occupancy
20.2 residents on an average day (81% of 25 beds)
Medicare history
Certified for 32 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.