Memorial Community Care in Aurora, NE has an overall 5-star rating, with strong staffing (5 stars; 4.68 nurse hours per resident day vs. the 4.1 federal benchmark) and no fines in the last 24 months. Its health inspection rating is 4 stars and quality measures are 3 stars, with recent citations related to quality assurance, food handling, and keeping residents fully informed.
Last inspection: February 2, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.6792.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.61
Licensed practical nurses
0.71
Nurse aides
3.36
Weekend nursing
3.95
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 28%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
41.7%30.8%Improving
Residents with a fall causing major injury
5.7%3.2%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
0%4.4%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%9.7%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
0%0%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
0%13.8%Worsening
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
8.1%7.6%No change
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
27.6%31%Worsening
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
31.5%36.7%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
5.7%10.3%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—100%—
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to make sure its quality review group had the required members and met at least every three months. Cited February 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 868 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited September 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The home failed to make sure residents fully understood their health status, care, and treatments. Cited September 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 552 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited September 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: E
The home failed to make sure the resident and doctor met face-to-face at all required visits. Cited September 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 712 — 42 CFR §483.30 — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
33 residents on an average day (69% of 48 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 47 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.