GoodStanding

Nursing home report

Meadow Manor

GRAND MEADOW, MN · Medicare-certified · 26 beds

In good standing
For-profitChain member
3 of 5 overall

Meadow Manor has a 3 out of 5 overall rating, with a strong health inspection score of 4 out of 5 but a low staffing rating of 1 out of 5. It had no fines in the last 24 months, and recent inspection citations included accident prevention, staffing data reporting, and quality assurance issues.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

Quality measures

Last inspection: February 18, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

24%

Residents with a fall causing major injury

0%

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

1.5%

Residents with a urinary tract infection

1.6%

Residents who lost too much weight

2.2%

Residents who were physically restrained

1.6%

Residents needing more help with daily activities

21.1%

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

27.1%

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

21.3%

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0%

Residents with a long-term catheter

1.7%

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

27.4%

Residents with depressive symptoms

12.3%

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

96.8%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

90%91.7%Improving

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited August 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G

The home failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information based on verifiable records. Cited February 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 851 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F

The home failed to have an ongoing quality review group that finds problems and makes corrective plans. Cited August 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 867 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to honor a resident’s right to manage their own money and financial affairs. Cited November 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 567 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E

The home failed to keep residents’ personal and medical records private and confidential. Cited January 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 583 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D

Recent history

  1. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of ACCURA HEALTHCARE · 41 homes · 2.4 stars avg
Occupancy
19.1 residents on an average day (73% of 26 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 39 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.