The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited March 2025 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: K
Nursing home report
BURLINGTON, NJ · Medicare-certified · 264 beds
Masonic Village at Burlington has an overall 2-star rating, with a 1-star health inspection rating, a 4-star quality rating, and a 5-star staffing rating with 5.24 reported nurse hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark. It is listed as a Special Focus Facility candidate/special focus facility and had $178,446 in fines in the last 24 months.
Health inspections
Staffing
5.2375 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.2375.
Hours per resident per day.
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
Residents with a fall causing major injury
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
Residents with a urinary tract infection
Residents who lost too much weight
Residents who were physically restrained
Residents needing more help with daily activities
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
Residents with a long-term catheter
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
Residents with depressive symptoms
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited March 2025 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: K
The home failed to respond appropriately to all reported abuse or neglect concerns. Cited March 2025 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 610 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: K
The home failed to ensure residents’ therapeutic diets were properly prescribed and managed by qualified staff. Cited March 2025 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 808 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: K
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: J
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: J
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
A federal fine of $92,035 was recorded.
A federal fine of $141,592 was recorded.
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
A federal fine of $86,411 was recorded.
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
On record with Medicare: 2 fines · $178,446 in total fines.
Federal fine
Mar 28, 2025
Federal fine
Oct 15, 2024
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.