The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited August 2019 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G
Nursing home report
MAPLEWOOD PARK PLACE
BETHESDA, MD · Medicare-certified · 31 beds
In good standing
For-profit
Data as of July 1, 2026
5 of 5 overall
5 of 5 stars overall. Maplewood Park Place in Bethesda has 5-star health inspection and quality ratings, no fines in the last 24 months, and no staffing rating reported; recent inspection issues involved accident prevention, care planning, and following care orders.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
Quality measures
Last inspection: March 10, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—44.4%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
—0%—
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—0%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—0%—
Residents who lost too much weight
—0%—
Residents who were physically restrained
—0%—
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—25%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—19.7%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—29.8%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
4.5%0%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
—0%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—25.5%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
—6.8%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—100%—
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
96.3%100%Improving
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: D
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited August 2019 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: D
Recent history
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Occupancy
- 17.4 residents on an average day (56% of 31 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 30 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.