GoodStanding

Nursing home report

MAPLEWOOD PARK PLACE

BETHESDA, MD · Medicare-certified · 31 beds

In good standing
For-profit
5 of 5 overall

5 of 5 stars overall. MAPLEWOOD PARK PLACE (BETHESDA, MD) also has 5 of 5 stars for health inspections and quality measures, no fines in the last 24 months, and no staffing rating provided; recent cited issues included accident hazards/supervision, care planning, and following treatment orders.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

Quality measures

Last inspection: March 10, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.

Resident outcomes

How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

48%Steady

Residents with a fall causing major injury

0%Steady

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

0%Steady

Residents with a urinary tract infection

0%Steady

Residents who lost too much weight

0%Steady

Residents who were physically restrained

0%Steady

Residents needing more help with daily activities

19.4%Steady

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

15.4%Steady
Show all measures

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

34.1%Steady

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

2.6%Worsening

Residents with a long-term catheter

0%Steady

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

28.6%Steady

Residents with depressive symptoms

2.4%Steady

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%Steady

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

100%Steady

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

99.2%Steady

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited August 2019 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G

The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D

The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: D

The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: D

The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited August 2019 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: D

Recent history

  1. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Occupancy
17 residents on an average day (55% of 31 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 30 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.