MAPLE LAWN SENIOR CARE (Fulda, MN) has an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Staffing is stronger than the federal benchmark at 4.57 hours per resident per day versus 4.1, with no fines in the last 24 months; health inspection and quality measures are both 3 stars, and recent citations involved nursing coverage and food service requirements.
Last inspection: February 26, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.5684.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.77
Licensed practical nurses
0.89
Nurse aides
2.90
Weekend nursing
4.03
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 60%
Registered nurse turnover: 56%
Resident outcomes
How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
15.1%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
7.9%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.4%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
5.2%Improving
Residents who were physically restrained
0.7%Improving
Residents needing more help with daily activities
23.6%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
17.9%Steady
Show all measures
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
17.6%Steady
Residents with a long-term catheter
0.7%Worsening
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
31.3%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
1.7%Improving
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
100%Steady
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
92.8%Improving
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
26.7%Steady
What the inspectors found
The home failed to have a registered nurse on duty enough hours each day and to keep a registered nurse as the full-time director of nursing. Cited February 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 727 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F
The home failed to have enough qualified staff to properly provide food and nutrition services. Cited February 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 801 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: F
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited December 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The home failed to have an ongoing quality review group that finds problems and makes corrective plans. Cited February 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 867 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F
The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited December 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: E
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 8 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
35.5 residents on an average day (77% of 46 beds)
Resident voice
Resident & family councils
Medicare history
Certified for 34 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.