Majestic Care of Manchin in Fairmont, WV has a 3 out of 5 overall rating, with stronger health inspection results (4/5) but weak staffing (1/5) and quality measures (2/5). There were no fines in the last 24 months, and recent inspection citations included resident safety, care planning, and accident prevention.
Last inspection: April 24, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
30%26.1%Improving
Residents with a fall causing major injury
7.7%6.9%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.2%5.1%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%0%No change
Residents who lost too much weight
4%8.7%Worsening
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—19%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—17.2%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
26.1%21.7%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
—4.3%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
26.6%10.5%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
3.8%0%Improving
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
96.2%100%Improving
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—87.7%—
What the inspectors found
The home failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment and daily care supports were provided safely. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 584 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: E
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to keep essential equipment working safely. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 908 — 42 CFR §483.90 — S/S: E
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 13 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 12 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $5,244 in total fines.
Federal fine
Aug 7, 2023
$5,244
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Government - State
Occupancy
31.3 residents on an average day (76% of 41 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 43 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.