The nursing home failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Cited September 2025 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 760 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(2) — S/S: J
Nursing home report
LORD CHAMBERLAIN MANOR
STRATFORD, CT · Medicare-certified · 60 beds
Needs attention
For-profitChain member
1 of 5 overall
LORD CHAMBERLAIN MANOR in Stratford, CT has an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, with 1-star health inspection and staffing ratings and a 4-star quality measures rating. It also has recent federal penalty status and $14,069 in fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
Quality measures
Last inspection: September 23, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $14,069recent federal penalty
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Staffing detail
Total staff turnover: 40%
Registered nurse turnover: 56%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0.7%0.9%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—71.6%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
68.3%86.8%Improving
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited October 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure nurses and nurse aides had the needed skills to care for each resident and support their well-being. Cited July 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 726 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: E
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited July 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: E
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited September 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: D
Recent history
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- PENALTY
A federal fine of $14,069 was recorded.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $14,069 in total fines.
- $14,069
Federal fine
Aug 27, 2025
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of RYDERS HEALTH MANAGEMENT · 8 homes · 1.6 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 42.8 residents on an average day (71% of 60 beds)
- Medicare history
- Certified for 29 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.