The home failed to have enough qualified staff to properly provide food and nutrition services. Cited March 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 801 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: F
Nursing home report
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
BALTIMORE, MD · Medicare-certified · 20 beds
In good standing
For-profit
Data as of July 1, 2026
4 of 5 overall
Little Sisters of the Poor in Baltimore has a 4 out of 5 overall rating, with strong staffing (5/5) and nurse staffing above the federal benchmark (7.25 vs. 4.1 hours per resident day), but a very low quality measures rating (1/5). It had no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
7.249 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: June 25, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 7.249.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.69
- Licensed practical nurses
- 1.42
- Nurse aides
- 4.14
- Weekend nursing
- 6.42
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 33%
Registered nurse turnover: 25%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—35.4%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
—10.4%—
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—8.7%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—1.6%—
Residents who lost too much weight
—3.1%—
Residents who were physically restrained
—0%—
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—31.8%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—21.1%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—44.8%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
—2.5%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—23.6%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
—0%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—100%—
What the inspectors found
The home failed to have an ongoing quality review group that finds problems and makes corrective plans. Cited March 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 867 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F
The home failed to give an adequate reason and proper information when transferring or discharging a resident. Cited March 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 622 — 42 CFR §483.15 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited March 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited March 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: E
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 22 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Occupancy
- 16.8 residents on an average day (84% of 20 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 16 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.