The nursing home failed to provide proper pressure ulcer care and failed to prevent new pressure sores from developing. Cited April 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 686 — 42 CFR §483.25(b) — S/S: G
Nursing home report
LAUREL CREEK HEALTH CENTER
FAIRFIELD, CA · Medicare-certified · 60 beds
In good standing
Non-profit
5 of 5 overall
LAUREL CREEK HEALTH CENTER has an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, with strong staffing at 5 stars and reported nurse staffing above the federal benchmark (5.28 vs. 4.1 hours per resident per day). Its health inspection rating is 4 stars, quality measures are 4 stars, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
5.2784 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: February 14, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.2784.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 1.40
- Licensed practical nurses
- 0.82
- Nurse aides
- 3.07
- Weekend nursing
- 4.67
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 29%
Registered nurse turnover: 38%
Resident outcomes
How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
0%Steady
Residents with a fall causing major injury
4.4%Steady
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
5.8%Steady
Residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5%Steady
Residents who lost too much weight
2%Steady
Residents who were physically restrained
0%Steady
Residents needing more help with daily activities
28.9%Steady
Show all measures
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
28.8%Steady
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
1%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
2.3%Steady
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
15.7%Steady
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%Steady
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
100%Steady
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
98.5%Steady
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
96.6%Steady
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
99.7%Steady
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited April 2019 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited February 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: E
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited February 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure meals and menus were planned, updated, and followed to meet residents’ nutritional needs. Cited February 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 803 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: E
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 9 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $35,493 in total fines.
- $35,493
Federal fine
Apr 3, 2024
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- Non profit - Other
- Occupancy
- 32.3 residents on an average day (54% of 60 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 27 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.