LA BELLE MANOR CARE CENTER has a 2-star overall rating, with a 2-star health inspection rating and a 3-star quality rating. Staffing is rated 4 stars and reported nurse staffing is 4.23 hours per resident per day, slightly above the federal benchmark of 4.1; there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: May 30, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.2276.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.42
Licensed practical nurses
0.80
Nurse aides
3.01
Weekend nursing
3.78
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 53%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
17.4%20%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
2.9%12.1%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
11.6%11.7%No change
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%10%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
6.9%6.7%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
9.4%18.8%Worsening
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—12.4%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
23.5%27.3%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
—0%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
2.6%2.3%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
3.4%9.7%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—100%—
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited January 2020 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited May 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited May 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: E
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited May 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: E
The home failed to provide appropriate care to help a resident maintain or improve movement and mobility. Cited May 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 688 — 42 CFR §483.25(c) — S/S: E
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 14 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Occupancy
36.9 residents on an average day (39% of 94 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 29 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.