GoodStanding

Nursing home report

KIT CARSON NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

JACKSON, CA · Medicare-certified · 199 beds

Needs attention
For-profitChain member
Data as of July 1, 2026
1 of 5 overall

Kit Carson Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in Jackson, CA has a 1-star overall rating, with 1-star health inspections, 2-star quality measures, and 4-star staffing above the federal benchmark (4.64 vs. 4.1 hours per resident day). It also has $28,327 in fines in the last 24 months and a recent federal penalty, with recent inspection citations involving care, notification, and accident-hazard/supervision issues.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

4.6391 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: May 8, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $28,327recent federal penalty

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.6391.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.83
Licensed practical nurses
0.76
Nurse aides
3.05
Weekend nursing
3.83

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 55%
Registered nurse turnover: 59%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

27%20.8%Improving

Residents with a fall causing major injury

0%0%No change

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

10.8%2.7%Improving

Residents with a urinary tract infection

1.9%0%Improving

Residents who lost too much weight

9.6%6.5%Improving

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

20.4%10.9%Improving

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

18.1%24.6%Worsening

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

33.3%20.4%Improving

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0%0%No change

Residents with a long-term catheter

1.8%0%Improving

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

15%4%Improving

Residents with depressive symptoms

0%0%No change

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

100%

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%100%No change

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

98.7%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

98.9%100%Improving

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited March 2026 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: G

The home failed to promptly tell the resident, doctor, and family about changes or problems affecting the resident. Cited February 2026 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 580 — 42 CFR §483.10(g)(14) — S/S: G

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G

The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited September 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: G

The home failed to provide enough nursing staff each day and ensure a licensed nurse was in charge on every shift. Cited March 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 725 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  5. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  6. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  7. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  8. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  9. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  10. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $9,870 was recorded.

  11. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $9,347 was recorded.

  12. PENALTY

    A federal payment denial was recorded.

  13. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $15,185 was recorded.

  14. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $14,380 was recorded.

  15. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $9,110 was recorded.

Penalties & enforcement

On record with Medicare: 3 fines · $28,327 in total fines · 1 payment denial.

  • Medicare/Medicaid payment denial

    Feb 19, 2026

    17 days
  • Federal fine

    Feb 19, 2026

    $9,870
  • Federal fine

    Feb 19, 2026

    $9,347
  • Federal fine

    Mar 28, 2025

    $9,110

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of EVA CARE GROUP · 9 homes · 3.4 stars avg
Occupancy
69.8 residents on an average day (35% of 199 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 56 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.