GoodStanding

Nursing home report

Inland Valley Rehabilitation Center

Registered name: INLAND VALLEY CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER

POMONA, CA · Medicare-certified · 221 beds

Needs attention
Special Focus candidateAbuse citationFor-profit
Data as of July 1, 2026
1 of 5 overall

Inland Valley Rehabilitation Center in Pomona has a 1-star overall rating, with a 1-star health inspection rating and special-focus facility/candidate status. Staffing is 3 stars and reported nurse staffing is 4.60 hours per resident per day, above the 4.1 federal benchmark, but the facility also has $77,344 in fines in the last 24 months and recent citations for treatment/care, timely notification, and abuse/neglect protections.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

4.5966 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: May 22, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $77,344special focus facility

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.5966.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.54
Licensed practical nurses
1.61
Nurse aides
2.45
Weekend nursing
4.39

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 28%
Registered nurse turnover: 17%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

11.1%14.9%Worsening

Residents with a fall causing major injury

1%1.6%Worsening

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

13.7%9.6%Improving

Residents with a urinary tract infection

2.6%2.1%No change

Residents who lost too much weight

2.2%2.8%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

4.1%2.6%Improving

Residents needing more help with daily activities

18.3%9.3%Improving

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

9.4%8.3%Improving

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

16.7%16.3%No change

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

1.8%3.4%Worsening

Residents with a long-term catheter

0.7%0.7%No change

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

12.7%11%Improving

Residents with depressive symptoms

0%1.3%Worsening

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

99.5%

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%100%No change

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

97%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

99.5%100%No change

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited June 2025 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: J

The home failed to promptly tell the resident, doctor, and family about changes or problems affecting the resident. Cited May 2025 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 580 — 42 CFR §483.10(g)(14) — S/S: J

The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited October 2025 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: G

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited August 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G

The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited July 2023 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: G

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  4. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  5. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  6. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  7. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  8. PENALTY

    A federal payment denial was recorded.

  9. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $42,169 was recorded.

  10. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $35,175 was recorded.

  11. PENALTY

    A federal payment denial was recorded.

Penalties & enforcement

On record with Medicare: 4 fines · $204,818 in total fines · 4 payment denials.

  • Medicare/Medicaid payment denial

    Oct 23, 2025

    5 days
  • Federal fine

    Jun 27, 2025

    $42,169
  • Federal fine

    May 9, 2025

    $35,175
  • Medicare/Medicaid payment denial

    Aug 9, 2024

    7 days
  • Medicare/Medicaid payment denial

    Jan 24, 2024

    16 days
  • Federal fine

    Jan 24, 2024

    $57,329
  • Medicare/Medicaid payment denial

    Jul 28, 2023

    23 days
  • Federal fine

    Jul 28, 2023

    $70,145

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Occupancy
218.7 residents on an average day (99% of 221 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 47 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.