Overall rating: 3 of 5 stars. Harding Pointe has a 1-star staffing rating, with reported nurse staffing at 3.14 hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark; its health inspection rating is 3 stars, quality measures are 5 stars, and there were $0 fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: December 11, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 3.1365.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.26
Licensed practical nurses
0.88
Nurse aides
2.00
Weekend nursing
2.74
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 38%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—33.3%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
2%0%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
0%0%No change
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%0%No change
Residents who lost too much weight
0%0%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
13.6%2.5%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
11%0%Improving
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
8.9%14.6%Worsening
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
11.3%21.4%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
95.7%97.7%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited December 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to keep its areas safe, easy to use, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. Cited June 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 921 — 42 CFR §483.90 — S/S: F
The home failed to honor residents’ choices about treatment, research participation, and advance care instructions. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 578 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to ensure the resident’s doctor reviewed their care and properly wrote, signed, and dated required notes and orders during visits. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 711 — 42 CFR §483.30 — S/S: E
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: E
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 14 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of JAG HEALTHCARE · 9 homes · 3.7 stars avg
Occupancy
47.3 residents on an average day (95% of 50 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 19 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.