GoodStanding

Nursing home report

Green Lea Senior Living

MABEL, MN · Medicare-certified · 41 beds

Needs attention
For-profitChain member
1 of 5 overall

1 of 5 stars overall. Green Lea Senior Living has the lowest overall rating, with 1 of 5 stars for health inspections and staffing, 4 of 5 stars for quality measures, and no fines in the last 24 months.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

Quality measures

Last inspection: October 17, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0lowest overall rating

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.

Resident outcomes

How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

3.8%Steady

Residents with a fall causing major injury

0%Steady

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

4.3%Worsening

Residents with a urinary tract infection

2.1%Worsening

Residents who lost too much weight

3.8%Steady

Residents who were physically restrained

0%Steady

Residents needing more help with daily activities

18.7%Steady

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

17.6%Steady
Show all measures

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

8.8%Worsening

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0%Steady

Residents with a long-term catheter

4.5%Improving

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

33.3%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

5.9%Improving

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

96%Steady

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%Steady

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

61.9%Steady

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

93.1%Steady

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited October 2025 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: J

The home failed to ensure its staff were properly licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. Cited October 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 839 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F

The home failed to have an ongoing quality review group that finds problems and makes corrective plans. Cited October 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 867 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F

The home failed to have a registered nurse on duty enough hours each day and to keep a registered nurse as the full-time director of nursing. Cited June 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 727 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F

The home failed to conduct and document a full facility assessment to ensure it had the resources needed for daily care and emergencies. Cited August 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 838 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F

Recent history

  1. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 9 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of ACCURA HEALTHCARE · 41 homes · 2.4 stars avg
Occupancy
27.7 residents on an average day (68% of 41 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 37 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.