GoodStanding

Nursing home report

GOLDEN ROSE CARE CENTER

PASADENA, CA · Medicare-certified · 99 beds

Needs attention
Special Focus candidateFor-profit
Data as of September 1, 2026
1 of 5 overall

GOLDEN ROSE CARE CENTER has a 1-star overall rating, with 1-star health inspections, 2-star staffing, and 3-star quality measures. It is flagged as a special focus facility/SFF candidate, had $30,765 in fines in the last 24 months, and reported nurse staffing of 4.41 hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

4.4142 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: July 30, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $30,765special focus facility

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.4142.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.73
Licensed practical nurses
1.18
Nurse aides
2.50
Weekend nursing
4.09

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 43%
Registered nurse turnover: 47%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

18.4%21.7%Worsening

Residents with a fall causing major injury

1.4%0%Improving

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

3.1%3.8%Worsening

Residents with a urinary tract infection

0%0%No change

Residents who lost too much weight

3.1%4.5%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

4.3%7.8%Worsening

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

—17.4%—

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

20.3%13.9%Improving

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0%0%No change

Residents with a long-term catheter

1%0%Improving

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

9.6%11%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

19.7%23.3%Worsening

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

—97.7%—

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

98.6%100%Improving

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

—87%—

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

92.8%96.9%Improving

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited February 2024 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: K

The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: J

The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: J

The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited November 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: G

The nursing home failed to provide proper pressure ulcer care and failed to prevent new pressure sores from developing. Cited July 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 686 — 42 CFR §483.25(b) — S/S: E

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 26 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  4. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  5. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  6. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  7. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  8. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  9. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  10. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  11. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  12. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $12,529 was recorded.

  13. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $18,236 was recorded.

Penalties & enforcement

On record with Medicare: 16 fines · $139,597 in total fines · 1 payment denial.

  • Federal fine

    Nov 26, 2024

    $12,529
  • Federal fine

    Oct 20, 2024

    $18,236
  • Federal fine

    Feb 20, 2024

    $4,938
  • Medicare/Medicaid payment denial

    Feb 8, 2024

    11 days
  • Federal fine

    Feb 8, 2024

    $29,097
  • Federal fine

    Jan 22, 2024

    $14,814
  • Federal fine

    Jan 8, 2024

    $4,938
  • Federal fine

    Jan 2, 2024

    $4,587

Operator & ownership

Recent ownership change · Dec 1, 2020

Now operated by Golden Rose Care Center, previously Rose Garden Healthcare Center.

Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Occupancy
85.8 residents on an average day (87% of 99 beds)
Medicare history
Certified for 58 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.