The nursing home failed to provide proper pressure ulcer care and failed to prevent new pressure sores from developing. Cited July 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 686 — 42 CFR §483.25(b) — S/S: G
Nursing home report
GLENWOOD SPRINGS HEALTHCARE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO · Medicare-certified · 54 beds
In good standing
For-profitChain member
2 of 5 overall
2 of 5 stars overall. Glenwood Springs Healthcare has a 1-star staffing rating, 3 stars for health inspections, and 4 stars for quality measures, with no fines in the last 24 months; recent inspection issues included pressure ulcer care, food handling standards, and infection prevention and control.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
Quality measures
Last inspection: October 17, 2024Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
31.9%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
5.8%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.3%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
0.8%Worsening
Residents who were physically restrained
0%Steady
Residents needing more help with daily activities
9.7%Steady
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
10.9%Steady
Show all measures
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
19.3%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%Steady
Residents with a long-term catheter
1%Improving
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
12.2%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
5.6%Steady
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
100%Steady
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
91.2%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
82.6%Steady
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
92.9%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited March 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited March 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The home failed to provide enough support staff to safely and effectively run food and nutrition services. Cited March 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 802 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: F
The home failed to protect residents’ right to organize and take part in resident and family groups. Cited October 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 565 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
Recent history
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 9 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $5,293 in total fines.
- $5,293
Federal fine
Sep 5, 2023
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of MADISON CREEK PARTNERS · 13 homes · 3.5 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 38.5 residents on an average day (71% of 54 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 37 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.